Plaintiff claims that Federal jurisdiction pursuant Article111 S/S2 which Extends the jurisdiction to cases arising underthe U. S. Constitution.
Plaintiff Albert F brings this suit pursuant to
Title42 U.S. codeS/S1983 for violations of Certain protections guaranteed to him by the First, Fourth, Fifth,Sixth, Eighth and ourteenth.
Amendments to the U. S. Constitution, and the U.S.Bill of Rights.
Judgement and financial reimbursements sought under the
Supreme Court Case of Bivens v. Six unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971),
And the State court jurisdiction of 42 U.S.C. & 1983.
Plaintiff Albert F brings this suit also pursuant To many improper disregards of the State of Michigan Jurisdictional legal codes by Judge Pajtas, Including extremely severe errors of logical Courtjudgement, Multiple prejudicial and biased interpretations of events and Direct violations of 6 of Albert F’s U.S. Constitutional Rights Including excessiveand extreme Court Orders to the Albert F Family.
Individually and in his official capacity as State Judge in the Circuit Court of Charlevoix Michigan,
Judge Richard Pajtas Reviews
June 3, 2013 Judge Richard Pajtas Lawsuit Brought By
******************** VERIFIED COMPLAINT: *********************
Albert F
EmmetCountyPlaintiff
Vs
JudgeRichard Pajtas
Jurisdictional Basis:
Plaintiff claims that Federal jurisdiction pursuant Article111 S/S2 which Extends the jurisdiction to cases arising underthe U. S. Constitution.
Plaintiff Albert F brings this suit pursuant to
Title42 U.S. codeS/S1983 for violations of Certain protections guaranteed to him by the First, Fourth, Fifth,Sixth, Eighth and ourteenth.
Amendments to the U. S. Constitution, and the U.S.Bill of Rights.
Judgement and financial reimbursements sought under the
Supreme Court Case of Bivens v. Six unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971),
And the State court jurisdiction of 42 U.S.C. & 1983.
Plaintiff Albert F brings this suit also pursuant To many improper disregards of the State of Michigan Jurisdictional legal codes by Judge Pajtas, Including extremely severe errors of logical Courtjudgement, Multiple prejudicial and biased interpretations of events and Direct violations of 6 of Albert F’s U.S. Constitutional Rights Including excessiveand extreme Court Orders to the Albert F Family.
Individually and in his official capacity as State Judge in the Circuit Court of Charlevoix Michigan,
Defendant.