MKMA, Inc.


Country United States
State Bangladesh
City Fort Lauderdale
Address 110 East Broward Boulevard, Suite 1650
Phone 1.855.624.2611
Website mkmainc.com/

MKMA, Inc. Reviews

  • Dec 24, 2014

Go to the following website and read the names of the men who are all partners with Larry May and Ed Daspin, AKA Edward Michaels,

Mr. Frank R. Price, Senior Vice President of Human Resources and Talent Acquisition, Partner

Mr. Peter Alsberg, Partner:

Mr. Dennis H. Kammerer, Partner

Mr. Rudolph Anthony Batarse, Partner

Mr. Malcolm Knight, Partner

Mr. Jacob Cherian, Partner

The same thing happen to me as this following story I beleive all of these partners are just as guitly as Ed Daspin because they say nothing and allow inoccent people to be hurt.

My company was a startup when Daspin and company promised to fund it. As part of the "partnership" we were to fund a portion of the company with a $60,000 infusion. We performed our requirement. One month later, we were supposed to start drawing salaries from the newly formed "partnership". When salaries were not forthcoming, our executive team demanded that Daspin and ROCC make good on the contract. Daspin responded by suing us personally and claimed that WE did not live up to our portion of the partnership. After spending thousands of dollars in legal fees (this is the Daspin MO... get the opponent to spend lots of money while you plan your escape), Daspin dropped the matter at the 11th hour as he was clearly going to lose the case. Through this, Daspin and his partners (Ron Stella, Maria Ellis and Robert Bob' Carr) lied in court submissions (I have proof of such lies). Despite the fact that Daspin tried to drop the matter with the courts, the judge saw through it and ordered that ROCC and its partners pay our legal fees which we would then use to go after Daspin personally. All the sudden, Daspin and his partnership have no money even though they were telling us through the negotiation how much cash they had and how sure our success was by working with them due to those resources.

Do not work with this guy. I can point you to any number of people who lost thousands (in our case more than 100K) to millions of dollars. He works by setting up corporate veils and hiding inside of them with the partners who work with him exposed so that he can take corporate funds in whatever way they are realized and pocket them leaving the actual owners with nothing. I spoke to one person who lost $2.5 MILLION at the hands of this guy. Stay away. Far, far away. The ways that Daspin has hurt people are too numerous to mention. While I was never too impressed with Daspin, I thought that the other partners were above board. Bob Carr is one such person. Should anyone ever need any help in a case like this, I welcome your contacting me and I will see what I can do. This guy must be stopped. Unfortunately, few seem to care all that much about stopping him (including the federal authorities).

  • Dec 23, 2014

Larry May and Ed Daspin MacKenzie Mergers and Acquisitions, Inc are scaming people.

Edward Michael Daspin and Larry May scam people into believing they can get a job by investing in thier company. They call it 401 forwarding. 2 1/2 % income.

Ed Daspin, a conficted felon, is currently under investigation with the SEC.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edward M. Daspin, a/k/a “Edward Michael,” a/k/a “Ed Michael,”, Civil Action No. 13-4622 (2d Cir.); 13 Misc. 389 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y)

Every MacKenzie so called Partners should be ashamed. They cover up the truth about Mike Daspin.

Read the law suite from the S E C.

I have a friend who has a law suite with them too.

  • Dec 21, 2014

MacKenzie Mergers & Acquisitions, Inc., Larry May and Ed Daspin and its affiliated Merchant Banks are complete thieves.

Edward Michael Daspin and Larry May conspire to trick people into investing money into a company using the 401 funding provision. Using the 401 a person can basically buy a job!! Not cool!

Ed Daspin, a conficted felon, is currently under investigation with the SEC.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edward M. Daspin, a/k/a “Edward Michael,” a/k/a “Ed Michael,”, Civil Action No. 13-4622 (2d Cir.); 13 Misc. 389 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y)

Every MacKenzie so called Partners should be ashamed. They cover up the truth about Mike Daspin. Not cool.

None of them should be trusted.

I know first hand they ripped me off. My money. My trust.

I dont know how people like them sleep at night? When it is only about the money.

  • Dec 21, 2014

This is Larry May partner!

Edward Daspin, AKA Ed Daspin

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 22920 / February 6, 2014

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Edward M. Daspin, a/k/a “Edward Michael,” a/k/a “Ed Michael,”, Civil Action No. 13-4622 (2d Cir.); 13 Misc. 389 (RMB) (S.D.N.Y)

Court of Appeals Denies Stay of Order Compelling Investigative Testimony; Affirms District Court's Exercise of Discretion

On February 5, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Cabranes, J.; Carney, J.; Droney, J.) issued a summary order denying Edward Daspin’s motion for a stay of a December 5, 2013 order of the Hon. Richard Berman of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and affirming Judge Berman’s order: (1) requiring Daspin to appear for investigative testimony in compliance with an SEC investigative subpoena; and (2) denying Daspin’s request that the SEC be required to pay for Daspin’s physician to attend the testimony. The Court of Appeals held that Daspin could not show that he was likely to succeed on the merits of his appeal in light of the conditions Judge Berman had ordered to address his claim that having to testify posed a threat to his health and had failed to show that he would suffer irreparable harm from appearing for the testimony under those conditions. Noting that Daspin’s appeal will be mooted by his appearance for testimony, and that the court already had the information necessary to decide the appeal, the court also affirmed Judge Berman’s order, ruling that Daspin had failed to show that the order was a clear abuse of the district court’s discretion.

For further information, please see Litigation Release Nos. 22884 (Dec. 4, 2013) and 22871 (Nov. 18, 2013).

Write a Review about MKMA, Inc.